Examples of an Introduction to a Scientific Article

Examples of an Introduction to a Scientific Article

A scientific publication will invariably follow a format that has been established in advance. One can divide a piece of writing into three distinct parts: the introduction, the primary body of the writing, and the conclusion. It would be inappropriate to begin this conversation by analysing the conclusion, just as one would do with any other piece of written work. 

Students usually don’t realise the significance of a strong introduction until they are far into the process of writing their first term papers, it is hard even for professional essay writers. Even still, it is clear that the higher the score, the more effectively this brief bit of language is worked out. The correlation between the two is clear. The introduction to a thesis or capstone project for graduation should be laid out almost as precisely as the rest of the information in the document. 

An article must be able to fulfil the following requirements before it can be considered for publishing in a scientific journal:

  • identifies if the subject matter of the paper has been adhered to or violated; 
  • provides evidence of the level of scientific innovation; 
  • verifies the importance of the topic.

When a piece of new material is being reviewed for the first time in the publication process, the introduction is frequently the only portion that is being read. If the editor is unable to be convinced that the study was conducted to a high scientific standard, he will not even bother to submit the paper for examination.

An introduction also offers a great deal of assistance, which is something that should not be overlooked.

What is the introduction to a scientific article?

In contrast to other types of writing assignments, such as term papers, diplomas, and dissertations, scientific articles do not have a “Introduction” section. However, this does not suggest that the thing in question does not exist. Find it by looking for the major components of the mixture. These are some of them:

  1. Relevance. In most cases, the text will start off with its justification. In the field of science, it is common practise to begin by explaining why study on a particular subject makes sense and is valuable in light of current circumstances.
  2. Target. In this section, the author outlines his goals for the outcome of the research that was conducted. To put it another way, this is the conclusion that was anticipated.
  3. Tasks. In a piece of writing that has a significant quantity of content, it is important to draw attention to the specific activities that the author carried out in order to achieve their goal. This should not be included in short articles because it is not essential.
  4. Examine the results of previous research on the topic. It is vital to bring attention to problems that have been overlooked by previous administrations either because they were unable to be resolved or because they were simply ignored. This remark offers an indirect signal of the importance and theoretical (or practical) distinctiveness of the subject matter, depending on how you look at it.
  5. The theoretical underpinnings. There will be instances when you will not view this section at all. If the purpose contains the words “prove,” “confirm,” or “refute,” then the hypothesis can be included in the investigation.
  6. A subject and focus of academic inquiry and investigation. Avoid getting these two concepts confused with one another because there is a significant gap between them. When the authors concentrate their attention on a particular item, person, or organization, they refer to that entity as being an object. Objects might be people, places, or organizations. An important characteristic, quality, state, or difficulty is referred to as an “item” while discussing an object.
  7. In the realm of science, novelty. The more prestigious the magazine, the more importance the editors place on these criteria when making their decisions on whether or not to publish a work that has been submitted to them. Work that is not currently being produced is immediately dismissed by reputable publications (particularly those included in the Scopus and Web of Science databases).

The theoretical and practical value of the works is only infrequently discussed. When writing a thesis, these concerns take on an even more crucial role. In certain circumstances, the introduction should include a discussion of the methods that were used to conduct the study. There are a few different settings in which they might be discussed, but overall, this topic ought to be avoided whenever possible. 

It’s possible that certain publications will prescribe the format of an article to you. These examples illustrate what should be included in the introduction.  As a consequence of this, you are required to obey not only the general standards but also the regulations that have been established by the magazine in question.

How to build a good introduction

  1. To begin, and contrary to the widespread perception, the introduction does not have to be written all at once in its whole right once. This is not even close to being correct! Before moving on to the meat of the research project, just a small amount of the introduction should be produced. This piece should mostly focus on the relevance, aims, and objectives. After then, the rest of the writing is completed.
  2. The second council that was held. If the criteria adhere properly, the beginning of the paper should take up between five and ten percent of the entire length of the document. This is a place where the defenders may concentrate their efforts.
  3. The beginning of the study project and its conclusion ought to be linked, as recommended by the third council. At the very least, a summary of the findings should be included in the conclusion. This summary should be based on the goals that were established for the research.

What to avoid

I would like to highlight the following as instances of the beginnings to scientific papers that are not very successful:

  1. Basically its absence.
  2. An effort to disguise a brief poetic introduction as an actual introduction, which demonstrates a lack of understanding of the differences between the scientific and artistic genres.
  3. When the introduction is included into the primary body of the text. As a result, the purpose of this study as well as the methodologies that were applied might be discussed in the middle of this paragraph. In some works, the introduction receives more attention and focus than the main body of the piece itself.

When introductions are not developed very well, there is an obvious connection that can be followed all the way back to the relationship. As a direct consequence of this, the author will not be able to present any findings. A goal that does not provide any results is much more common than one that does not produce any outcomes.